Log in
Treasury Secretary Paulson’s proposed massive bailout of Wall Street’s
tarnished titans reminds people here of the billions the IMF hustled
up after ’97 in the name of assisting them—money that was used
instead to rescue foreign investors.
So Asian governments and financial players are skeptical about
Washington’s talk of re-regulating the financial sector, and, although
their central banks and sovereign wealth funds are flush with cash,
they’re wary about being drawn into the Wall Street maelstrom. Among
East Asian official funds, only Singapore’s Temasek and the China
Investment Corporation have stepped up to the plate. Temasek pumped over $4 billion into Merrill Lynch a few months ago, but only after driving a hard bargain. CIC invested $5 billion in Morgan Stanley last December but refused the troubled investment bank’s recent desperate plea to increase its share of the firm. Initially seen as a potential savior, the Korean Development Bank turned down the overtures of Lehman Brothers a week before the latter’s historic collapse into bankruptcy.
Trillions of dollars of Asian public and private money are invested in
US firms and property, with the five biggest Asian holders accounting
for over half of all foreign investment in US government debt
instruments. Funds from Asia have become a key prop of US government spending and the middle-class consumption that have become the drivers of the American economy. With so much of Asia’s wealth relying on the stability of the US economy, there is not likely to be any precipitate move to abandon Wall Street securities and US Treasury bills.
At home, however, there are growing worries, and consumer advocates, NGOs and academics are demanding more transparency about how much the local banking system is exposed to Wall Street’s toxic assets. In the Philippines, there are calls from civil society groups for the banning of derivatives trading, the return of capital controls and the renegotiation of the country’ massive foreign debt now that the
international banks are in a weak position.
There is, moreover, resignation throughout Asia about the
inevitability of a deep US recession and its likely massive impact on
the East: the United States is China’s top export destination, while
China imports raw materials and intermediate goods from Japan, Korea
and Southeast Asia to shape into the products it sends to the United
States. Despite some talk a few months ago about the possibility that
the economic fate of Asia could be "decoupled" from that of the United
States, most observers now see these economies as members of a chain gang shackled to one another, at least in the short and medium term.
Greater regional integration is now seen widely as a healthy antidote
to a global integration that has run out of control. Some elements of
regional economic cooperation are now in place, notably the so-called
"ASEAN Plus Three" formation, which unites the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations with China, Korea and Japan in a mechanism to facilitate bilateral exchanges of funds in the event of a financial
crisis. Eventually this arrangement could become a full-blown regional
monetary fund.
On the other hand, NGOs and social movements, while in theory
supportive of integration, distrust a process monopolized by governing
elites they view as unaccountable. Active participation of civil
society, they insist, must be central to the crafting of such regional
formations.
*Walden Bello, professor of sociology at the University of the
Philippines, is the author of Dilemmas of Domination (Holt), president
of the Freedom from Debt Coalition, and senior analyst at the Bangkok-
based institute Focus on the Global South. This article first appeared
in The Nation (online) 24 September 2008.
